PROPHETIC CONVERGENCE – PART XXIII

In our review of where we’ve been, so far we’ve covered the Gay Agenda, Abortion, Terror / ISIS, The Refugee Issue and took a cursory look at the American Policy in the Middle East that’s been feeding the terror and creating the chaos – all in the name of exercising some sort of control of the future. (We’re trying to play God.)

WHERE WE’VE BEEN – 3

“Then He said to them, ‘But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one.’” (Luke 22:36)

DISARMING AMERICA

 

Americans forcibly disarmed in New Orleans after Katrina

Americans forcibly disarmed in New Orleans after Katrina

The liberal obsession with disarming American citizens has been one of the most irrational and disingenuous movements of modern times. The reason given is that it would advance the safety of society and the individual. But history has proven it does nothing of the sort. And now the issue has come once again to the forefront, advanced in a patently illegal manner by President Obama and his administration in the face of reason and facts. Every shooting incident – [for several decades now, almost without exception occurring in ‘gun free zones’] – is used as an excuse to advance the anti-gun narrative. But let’s start by looking at the wording of the Second Amendment to the Constitution. The entire amendment is short and to the point. “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” As recently as 2008, the United States Supreme Court ruled in District of Columbia v Heller, that it was individuals that enjoyed the right to possess and carry firearms.[i] In the past, the Court has ruled that this right exited even prior to the Constitution. It grew out of English Law. And the English jurist and legal commentator William Blackstone held that it was a natural right that supported other rights such as self defense and the resistance to oppression.[ii]

[iii]So let’s understand this. The right to bear arms was – in a sense – never granted by the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution. It was recognized. It comes from the right to self-defense which is God-given and derives from the very right to life. When Jefferson penned the words “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” and attributed them to the Creator, he was referring ot Natural Law, as opposed to Positive Law, or laws made by man. The British Dictionary defines Natural Law as “an ethical belief or system of beliefs supposed to be inherent in human nature and discoverable by reason rather than revelation.” Even the ancient philosophers understood that there was a moral basis for all of life that derived from God Himself. The Apostle Paul recognizes this when he writes in his letter to the Romans: “For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them.” (Romans 2:14-15) [Allow me this digression. The Biblical understanding of Natural Law goes even deeper than man’s. Jesus eqated even looking at a woman with lust as adultery, and being angry with our brother as murder. The Natural Law then becomes something that is based on the Law of Love. As recorded in Matthew 22:-40, Jesus defines the Greatest Commandment. “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.”] So the idea of disarming citizens is a violation of natural law. And that is exactly what is happening in America today.

Just this week, President Obama issued exective orders expanding government limitation of 2nd Amendment rights, including the imposition of background checks to many forms of private sales. The Washington Free Beacon reports: “The Obama administration announced during a conference call with reporters Monday evening that the president’s upcoming executive order may require somebody selling even a single firearm to obtain a Federal Firearms License.”[iv] And as reported by Infowars: “The Obama administration has authorized a rule allowing doctors to turn in patients they deem mentally ill so the government can strip them of their Second Amendment right.”[v] This was apparently not enough for Democrat Presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton who struggled to get to the totalitarian Left of the President by offering the opinion that these measures could not possibly go far enough.[vi] But Judge Andrew Napolitano offered this critique on FOX News. “A presidential executive order is a written instruction to persons in the executive branch of the federal government informing them of the manner in which the president wants federal laws or regulations enforced. Executive orders do not direct private persons, or persons in the legislative or judicial branches of government…. President Obama has very little room to issue executive orders on guns because the congressional legislation is so extensive, detailed, and clear. The principal thrust of the president’s orders addresses the requirement for background checks in occasional sales and the requirement that occasional sellers become federal licensees and the imposition of reporting upon physicians. Congress has expressly removed occasional sales (sales not made by full-time dealers) from the obligation of obtaining federal licenses and from conducting background checks. The president is without authority to negate the congressional will on this, and any attempt to do so will be invalidated by the courts. Mr. Obama will now require that anyone who sells a gun, that is even an ‘occasional’ seller will be required to perform a background check. By defining what an “occasional seller” is, the president is essentially interpreting the law, a job reserved for the courts.”[vii]

587-2

C’mon? Who’s buying this ?

But to the PTB and their Leftist henchmen, constitutionality will never be the issue. You see, all evidence points to the fact that the liberal establishment, which encompasses but is not limited to the Democrat Party, has every intention of effectively disarming American citizens – [except of course for hunters, a false distinction they make if their ever was one, designed to fool the ignorant into thinking they support gun rights.] Even that will be limited, regulated and licensed. But it goes much farther. As reported on Infowars back in 2013: “Former Navy SEAL Ben Smith warns [viii]that the Obama administration is asking top brass in the military if they would be comfortable with disarming US. citizens, a litmus test that includes gauging whether they would be prepared to order troops to fire on Americans.” Pointing to actions targeting especially veterans of the Afghan and Iraqi wars, Smith believes the Federal government is “trying to provoke veterans into violence as an excuse to implement martial law.”[ix] And if you check the record, completley disarming all Americans may be just what this administration is all about. Barack Obama has quite the history of opposition to gun rights. In 1996 he pushed for a ban on all hand guns. In 1998 he wanted to stop the sale of all semi-automatic weapons. “In 2004, he advocated banning gun sales within five miles of a school or park, which would have shut down nearly all gun stores.”[x] While campaigning in Pennsylvania in 2008 he stated unequivocally: “I am not in favor of concealed weapons.”[xi] But the most telling evidence may lie in the statement he purportedly made to a colleague when he was teaching at the University of Chicago Law School. He is reported to have told fellow lecturer John Lott, “I don’t believe people should be able to own guns.”[xii] [xiii] In all of this he serves as a loyal servant of the PTB that are scheming World Government.

The fact of the matter is the US Government has been involved in a scheme to disarm the American public since at least the early 1960s. It was President Kennedy that presented to the UN, America’s proposal for total disarmament as laid out in State Department Publication 7277, Freedom From War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It called for nation states to give up their arms, establishing the United Nations as the only accepted military power on the globe. Kennedy told the UN that this plan “would achieve, under the eyes of an international disarmament organization, a steady reduction in force, both nuclear and conventional, until it has abolished all weapons except those needed for internal order and a new United Nations Peace Force.” The Freedom From War program was subsequently refined under the title: Blueprint for the Peace Race. The proposal, which has never been withdrawn by the US, had four major objectives.

  1. Disbanding National Armed Forces and the formation of a United Nations Peace Force
  2. The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order.” This would necessarily prohibit the private ownership of firearms.
  3. The establishment of an International Disarmament Organization to ensure compliance.
  4. Establishment of a UN peacekeeping force to “take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary” to restore order.[xiv]

Total disarmament is but a tool in this UN / US / Illuminatti plan for the establishment of a World Government. That plan is tied in to the thoroughly occultic vision of the House of Theosophy and one of its seminal figures, Alice Bailey. The creation of this One World Government – (and One World Religion, by the way) – was a long-time dream of the Theosophical Society founded by Madame Helena Blavatsky in the late 19th century. Just so you know who these guys are, here’s a little history. Blavatsky, Satanist Benjamin Crème and one Alice Bailey, revealed their religious philosophies through “automatic writing”, while possessed by various Ascended Masters. These “Masters” are none other than the Fallen Angels of the Bible. The doctrine they teach is a complete reversal of the Truth found in the Scriptures. To their twisted way of thinking: God is the evil one, and Satan the “Light Bearer”. Madame Blavatsky writes: “Lucifer is divine and terrestrial light…. Satan is the god of our planet, and the only god.”[xv] The Great Jehovah, the God of the Bible, she describes as “spiteful and revengeful.[xvi] The Theosophists were tied to the League of Nations and the UN through Alice Bailey’s Lucis Trust Publishing, formerly called Lucifer Publishing. [I guess her spirit guides didn’t think of the fact that that name – Lucifer Publishing – might be a little to extreme to fly under the radar. So it was changed after one year.] In The Externalization of the Hierarchy, Alice Bailey wrote: “The Atomic bomb does not belong to the three nations who perfected it and who own its secrets at present — the United States, Great Britain, and Canada. It belongs to the United Nations for use … or threatened use when aggressive action on the part of any nation rears its ugly head.”[xvii] Here’s the connection, as explained by David Bay of Cutting Edge Ministries. “Therefore, the plan is for the United Nations to use nuclear weapons against any nation or organization who threatens its global power; but, of course, the U.N. cannot use nuclear war against another nation unless it is the only government in the world who possesses nuclear weapons! This argument is essentially the same as for national Gun Control. Only after a government disarms its citizenry can it impose a dictatorship![xviii]

Whether planned or not – that is where all of these disarmament schemes ultimately lead. Given enough time, the history of civilian disarmament has without fail resulted in state-sponsored genocide. Here are some examples.

  • During World War I, the Turks began by requiring permits, then made a list of owners and finally banned possession. It ended with the slaughter of up to 1.5 million Armenian civilians.
  • The Soviet Union went from licensing to a ban. From 1929 to 1945 – 20 million defenseless civilians were killed.
  • Nazi Germany went from Registration and Licensing to making firearms illegal. The Nazis took 20 million civiian lives.
  • Nationalist China started with a permit system and ended by making private ownership illegal. Ten million were killed.
  • Red China murdered between 20 and 35 million of its citizens – including anyone resisting a government program or supplying weapons to others.
  • Guatemala, Uganda, Cambodia and Rwanda all went the same route.[xix]

This is the natural legacy of gun confiscation. Thus the reason for the existence of the Second Amendment is to secure all our other natural rights. But the momentum of confiscation is moving forward even as I write this. Beginning the first of the year, the State of California saw a law go into effect “that allows legally-owned guns to be confiscated if family or friends believe the owner is a threat to themselves or others.[xx] And there are videos out there that purport to show US Marines, UN Forces and Department of Homeland Security agents practicing gun confiscations.[xxi] That’s the ultimate end game. And confiscation will pave the way for the establishment of the new world government desired by the Iluminatti and required by End Times prophecy.

[i] Earl Pollock, The Supreme Court and American Democracy, Greenwood, pg 423, 2008

[ii] William Blackstone, Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book the First, pg 139

[iii] Image: What would a large-scale gun confiscation look like?, Police State USA, March 8, 2014

[iv] OBAMA EXECUTIVE ORDER MAY REQUIRE THOSE SELLING EVEN A SINGLE FIREARM TO BECOME LICENSED

DEALERS, Washington Free Beacon, January 5, 2016

[v]OBAMA RULE ALLOWS DOCTORS TO TURN IN GUN OWNERS THEY DECIDE ARE MENTALLY ILL, Infowars, January 4, 2016

[vi] White House outlines gun control moves, CNN, January 5, 2016

[vii] Judge Andrew Napolitano, Judge Napolitano: Why Obama’s executive action on guns is unconstitutional, FOX News, January 5, 2016

[viii] Image: White House released photo, February 2013

[ix] SEAL Veteran: Military Leaders Being Asked if They Will Disarm Americans,

[x] Author Quotes Then-Professor Obama Saying, ‘I Don’t Believe People Should Be Able To Own Guns’, CNS News, March 6, 2013

[xi] Candidates’ gun control positions may figure in Pa. Vote, Pittsburgh Tribune, April 2, 2008

[xii] Does Obama Think People Should Be Allowed to Own Guns?, Breitbart, July 29, 2015

[xiii] Author Quotes Then-Professor Obama Saying, ‘I Don’t Believe People Should Be Able To Own Guns’, CNS News,

March 6, 2013

[xiv] John F McManus, Top Down Treason, 247 News, Vol 11 No7, April 3, 1995

[xv] Helen Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine II, pgs 513, 234

[xvi] The New Age Religion…, Red Moon Rising, referring to footnotes found in Helen Blavatsky’s Secret Doctrine pg 439

[xvii] Alice Bailey, The Externalization of the Hierarchy, Lucis Trust, 1957, pg 548

[xviii] David Bay, News 1892, Cutting Edge Ministries, monitored January 6, 2016

[xix] Susan Duclos, Nugent: ‘We The People Must Raise Hell Or Die’ – US Marines, DHS & UN Practicing For Gun Confiscation, ANP, January 3, 2016

[xx] California gun confiscation law takes effect Jan. 1, KRCTV, December 31, 2015

[xxi] Susan Duclos, Nugent: ‘We The People Must Raise Hell Or Die’ – US Marines, DHS & UN Practicing For Gun Confiscation, ANP, January 3, 2016

Speak Your Mind

*