PART 6 – TYRANNY & PUSHBACK
Virginia just joined the list of states that require you to wear a mask in public. [Now, many medical experts, including the chameleon-like Dr Fauci have said they don’t do a whole lot of good protecting you from the virus. Here is what the good doctor had to say on 60 Minutes – (with comment by Molly McCann of The Federalist). “There is no reason to be walking around wearing a mask. When you are in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel better, and might even block a droplet,” he said with almost an eyeroll, “but it’s not providing the perfect protection people think it is, and often there are unintended consequences.”[i] But the idea is – you feed the fear. [And if you happen to take down the economy in the process, why that will protect you from the reelection of The Donald….And besides a mask is good ‘virtue signaling.’ ‘Yeah, we know it’s not doing much good, but it shows how much we care….So we are sooooo better than you!] Mandatory masks are a tool of social conditioning, acclimating society to the TOTAL CONTROL of the Globalists. Geoffrey Grider of NTEB weighs in. “The mandatory masks serve as a physical and ever-present reminder that they are in control, and that we are powerless.”[ii] And the fact is, studies show a mixed bag or results. Dr Colin Furness, an infection control epidemiologist and assistant professor at the University of Toronto cites a UK medical journal study that showed “health-care workers who wore cloth masks all day while working were 13 times more likely to get a respiratory illness when compared to the standard practice of only wearing a mask when necessary. Those who wore a paper or procedure mask were twice as likely to get some type of respiratory infection if they wore it all day.”[iii] [So…I’m not a doctor….and neither are the governors making these decisions….just sayin’.] McCann’s conclusion: “Mandatory masks are a critical predicate conditioning us to accept abuses of our liberty. Mandatory masking provides the foundation on which governments continue to justify emergency measures and rule by executive fiat, and it creates a national mood of consent.”[iv] And consent ain’t liberty. That type of control is designed for subjects….NOT Americans!!
Then there’s my own state of New York. You can’t have a church service with more than ten people. The ‘Direktor’ of the Western New York church reopening put out a guidance. No more than ten at a service – and you register them and take their names. Well, in New York it may be against Governor Cuomo’s Diktats to attend a large church service but it is against the Constitution to prevent that and it is required by the Word of God. First the scripture, Hebrews 10:25, “Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.” (KJV) Now, here’s the 1st Amendment. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” The key phrase: “prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” People are starting to strike back.
Earlier this week I was part of a group of 70 pastors that assembled to inform the government that it is trampling on our rights given us by God and enshrined in the highest law of the land, the Constitution. The Governor – and any officials that would enforce those illegal edicts – are breaking the oath they made to uphold and defend that Constitution. The rally was organized by Pastor Louis Guadagno of the Old Time Baptist Church in Hamburg NY and featured Assemblyman David DiPietro. Pastor Guadagno tied the themes together. “Today we exercise our right to peaceably assemble. Your right is protected by the First Amendment. Today the press is here and the freedom of the press is guaranteed by the same First Amendment. The same amendment that gives every American the right to have church.”[v] It was great to be a part of a message to Governor that said: 1) Yes we are an essential service – and – 2) You are violating our constitutional rights when you prevent us from assembling for church services. One pastor noted that he knew of 13 churches that never closed – and announced for the cameras that his church would be open this Sunday – but following all of the distancing and safety guidelines of the CDC.
New York pastors are not the only ones pushing back. The Federalist reports: “When the Minnesota governor excluded churches from his Phase I reopening plan, Catholic and Lutheran leadership announced, through counsel, that their churches would reopen with or without the state’s blessing. The governor’s resulting about-face was probably not due to a legal epiphany. Rather, he understood he’d pushed the envelope too far. Minnesotans wouldn’t put up with any further abuse of their religious freedoms.”[vi]
Now even the policy of social distancing is suspect. It was adopted as policy during the George W Bush years – primarily by politicians – against a good deal of scientific pushback. [However, as a ‘wait-for-the-vaccine-control-strategy, it made a lot of sense for the Gates, Fauci & WHO crowd.] In 2006 a panel of doctors published a paper titled: Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenza. [Catchy little title I found in the National Library of Medicine.] Here is their argument.)
“There are no historical observations or scientific studies that support the confinement by quarantine of groups of possibly infected people for extended periods in order to slow the spread of influenza… It is difficult to identify circumstances in the past half-century when large-scale quarantine has been effectively used in the control of any disease. The negative consequences of large-scale quarantine are so extreme (forced confinement of sick people with the well; complete restriction of movement of large populations; difficulty in getting critical supplies, medicines, and food to people inside the quarantine zone) that this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration…
“Home quarantine also raises ethical questions. Implementation of home quarantine could result in healthy, uninfected people being placed at risk of infection from sick household members. Practices to reduce the chance of transmission (hand-washing, maintaining a distance of three feet from infected people, etc.) could be recommended, but a policy imposing home quarantine would preclude, for example, sending healthy children to stay with relatives when a family member becomes ill. Such a policy would also be particularly hard on and dangerous to people living in close quarters, where the risk of infection would be heightened….”
“Travel restrictions, such as closing airports and screening travelers at borders, have historically been ineffective. The World Health Organization Writing Group concluded that ‘screening and quarantining entering travelers at international borders did not substantially delay virus introduction in past pandemics… and will likely be even less effective in the modern era’… It is reasonable to assume that the economic costs of shutting down air or train travel would be very high, and the societal costs involved in interrupting all air or train travel would be extreme”[vii] [viii]
Despite the arguments and the – at least – unsettled science, Governors and local officials are using the Ideology of lockdowns and social distancing to increase government control. That is just as we explained in last week’s article. The burgeoning tyranny is changing what America and the World will look like going forward. Consider this offering from Gideon Litchfield in the MIT Technology Review.
“We don’t know exactly what this new future looks like, of course. But one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public transport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity—an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been vaccinated against the latest virus strains.”[ix]
Of course, all of this ties in with Immunity Passports, know being called for by the airlines. You won’t be able to travel without one. And that, of course again, ties in with the Bill Gates promoted ID 2020. They want everyone on the planet to have a digital ID From Pharos: “A digital identity for every citizen on the globe has been identified by the World Bank and World Economic Forum as an important part in the realisation of the Sustainable Development Goals.”[x] [xi]
This is the march of the Globalists leading us toward a New World Order. 2030 is their new target gate. This is a fight we need to make and a stand we need to take. For though we watch the Old Order unraveling, take heart! For as Jesus described the fearful signs of the times that would precede His return, He told them: “Now when these things begin to happen, look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption draws near.” (Luke 21:28)
[i] Molly McCann, Mandatory Masks Aren’t About Safety, They’re About Social Control, The Federalist, May 27, 2020
[ii] Geoffrey Grider, MANDATORY MASKS HAVE VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH SAFETY AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH
SOCIAL CONTROL, NTEB, May 27, 2020
[iii] Use of masks during COVID-19 not always the answer, says epidemiologist, CBC, May 10, 2020
[iv] Molly McCann, Mandatory Masks Aren’t About Safety, They’re About Social Control, The Federalist, May 27, 2020
[v] Ron Plants, Pastors push to reopen churches in New York State, WGRZ, May 26, 2020
[vi] Molly McCann, Mandatory Masks Aren’t About Safety, They’re About Social Control, The Federalist, May 27, 2020
[vii] Thomas V Inglesby 1, Jennifer B Nuzzo, Tara O’Toole, D A Henderson, Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic
Influenza, National Library of Medicine, 2006;4(4):366-75. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2006.4.366.
[viii] Did you know the bogus idea of ‘social distancing’ was invented by a 14-year-old girl during the Bush administration in 2006?,
Russia Today, May 26, 2020
[ix] Gideon Litchfield, We’re not going back to normal, MIT Technology Review, March 17, 2020
[x] Corona Crisis Control – Digital Identification Für Alle, Pharos, April 6, 2020
[xi] Stefan Stanford, Covid-19 And The Globalists Not-So-Stealthy Attempt To Overthrow America, ANP, May 25, 2020
Leave a Reply