Donald J Trump is setting out a bold course for the start of his presidency. The nominations of RFK, Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel at the FBI would all be transformative if pulled off. The specter of mass deportations and a completed border wall signal a return to national sanity regarding immigration. The setting up of a new Department of Government Efficiency under Elon Musk & Vivek Ramaswamy is an exciting prospect for weeding out bureaucratic fecklessness. And though all of these policies and appointments show promise, they will not come easily – nor possibly peacefully. Resistance could be more than political and could end up in the streets. Still, they represent the promise of America’s return to the principles of its’ founding and history.
But then there are the pronouncements of the last few days which can be puzzling, confusing and very conceivably troubling because of the direction they may be signaling. I found them to be a bit strange – but first just passed them off as Trumpisms – the fruit of a fertile imagination. But then listening to an interview with Leo Hohmann and reading an article by Patrick Wood in Technocracy News, I think they may be something we should take a look at more closely. Here’s the short case as laid out by Patrick Wood.
- “Trump offers to buy Greenland but doesn’t rule out force to get it
- Trump says that the U.S. is going to reclaim the Panama Canal from the Chinese and Panama, and again, he doesn’t rule out force to get it”
- One reporter “reporter asked Trump if could assure he would not use ‘military or economic coercion’ to take control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.” Trump answers, “I’m not going to commit to that.”
- “Trump states intent to make Canada into the 51st state
- Trump announced a name change from the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America”
“Canadian and Shark Tank star Kevin O’Leary went to Mar-a-Lago to speak with Trump about merging Canada with the United States. Trump wrote on Truth Social, ‘If Canada merged with the U.S., there would be no Tariffs, taxes would go way down, and they would be TOTALLY SECURE from the threat of the Russian and Chinese Ships that are constantly surrounding them.’”

Are these just moves to restore American power and security. Or is there something more to this. Both Hohmann and Wood suggest this could be related to a long-standing globalist plan to merge the Northern Western Hemisphere on the order of a European Union type structure. Here is some of the trail of clues.
In 1934, a group of Technocrats put out a map of North America, calling it The American Technate. It stretched from south of Panama all the way though Canada and included Greenland. Their game was to “to replace all political systems with engineers and scientists,” in a giant “super state.”

Jump forward to 2005 and you have George Bush, Vicente Fox, Stephen Harper, representing the US, Mexico and Canada – proposing a Task Force that would work toward the creation, by 2010 of a “North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity.” This was the naturally produced fruit of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Henry Kissinger said that NAFTA will “represent the most creative step toward a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the Cold War, and the first step toward an even larger vision of a free-trade zone for the entire Western Hemisphere.”
The plan was massively ambitious. “A telling part of the NAU initiative was NASCO, or North America’s SuperCorridor Coalition. It sought to establish a unified train-based supply chain between Mexico and Canada, using Kansas City as an ‘Inland Port’ to process customs. The idea was to build a deep-water port in Lazaro Cardenas, Mexico with express train services up through Texas into Kansas City and then into points into Canada. The corridor was also slated to contain pipelines for water, oil and natural gas and well as high-voltage transmission lines. It would have been one of the largest eminent domain land-grabs ever conducted, with the ultimate seizure of 584,000 acres of land held privately, mostly by ranchers and farmers.” The pushback in the alternative press was huge and the governments were forced to back off the plan.” However, years later, “President Obama led Mexico, Canada and the U.S. to create ‘North American Climate, Clean Energy And Environment Partnership.’”
Patrick Wood looks at all of this and offers this. “To everyone’s surprise, Trump has just verbalized a grand vision to Make America Great Again by building a super-state that is virtually identical to Technocracy’s vision from the 1930s.” As Wood rightly points out, Trump’s proposal would give America dominance from Panama to Greenland.[i] Perhaps I’m reading a little too much into this. Yet I think it is wise to be careful how we view what is being proposed.
And oh, there is one more thing. “Trump has announced that Hussain Sajwani, an Emirati billionaire businessman who founded the property development giant DAMAC Properties, will invest $20 billion in new data centers across the United States…. The data centers will primarily support AI and cloud technologies.”[ii] Of course, that data can be used to increase the surveillance of American citizens. Is that just another piece of the control grid and the American Technate? It’s a question we have to ask.
[i] Patrick Wood, Is Trump Pursuing Technocracy’s Dream To Create The Great American Technate?, Technocracy News,
January 8, 2025
[ii] Trump announces $20B plan to build new data centers in the US, TechCrunch.com, January 7, 2025
Leave a Reply